form relationships?"
To defuse such incendiary issues, the
instructions are:
"You might point out the stereotype which
equates being gay with sex and note your own discomfort
with the question."
Then the speaker is advised to fog the
question: "[A]sk how people in the audience would
feel if someone asked them for the details of their sex
life" and say that "...gay and lesbian sex
...is not any different from imaginative [note the
adjective] heterosexual sex...", and "...it is
a very frightening experience for some of us... [A]t the
same time... this experience is what can make sex between
two gay people so wonderful."
On the "S&M" question, it is
suggested the issue be defused with "ask[ing] the
questioner to define what he/she means by S&M
sex" which, of course, compels a classroom
description and discussion.
Further, "you might want to present a
spectrum of opinion. Some speakers have stated that
S&M sex is often an exploration of the power
relationship between people..." -- again, the
rationale, the legitimization attempt. Speakers should
use words such as "fantasies" and
"consensual," and bring up the topic of
"non-consensual activities"
|
as "child-abuse,
the subjugation of women, and so forth."
With regard to "man/boy love," there
is to be no mention of "men raping boys."
Instead, "It is important to immediately label the
topic as 'intergenerational sex'..."
The suggested propaganda for pedophilia
culminates in the statement, "NAMBLA's main purpose
is support, not sex, and not rape. NAMBLA may be is
singled-out because it is a GAY organization."
The manual goes on to assert that "the
vast majority of child molestations occur between
heterosexual men and young girls" -- a statement has
no statistical backing from any credible source to date.
Homosexual activism's "friends in the
media" are not left out of this discussion. They are
quoted [it is interesting how political bases, once
established, back each other, is it not?] and used
recursively. On "forming relationships," the
question is to be answered by citing an editorial that
appear 18 years ago -- July 9, 1978 --in the New York
Times, mentioning a "study" by a "Bell
Institute for Sex Research" concluding that
"some [homosexual couples and multiples] are
considerably happier and better adjusted than
heterosexuals as a whole."
The manual concludes its
|