But
a host of previously unreported criminal complaints
against Whitehead have surfaced in court papers obtained
by Electric Nevada this week.
The documents -- filed in a case that the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in
San Francisco, recently agreed to hear -- allege that
Whitehead for years knowingly and maliciously entered
unlawful orders and sanctions against a Sparks
businessman in an effort to compel him to abandon
debt-collection rights won in a 1987 federal bankruptcy
court judgment and to keep him from competing in the
paging market with the debtor company.
The debtor company, a Reno beeper firm now
known as Fast Page, was known as ARC Systems of Reno,
Inc. at the time of its 1987 bankruptcy reorganization
plan, supervised by U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge James H.
Thompson.
Under that plan [see accompanying story for
details], the firm agreed that representatives of its
creditors were to be allowed to "inspect any of the
equipment" as collateral for money owed the
creditors, "at a reasonable place and in a
reasonable manner at any reasonable time."
However, in August, 1988, when an attorney for
businessman Mark A. Edwards -- a paging systems
entrepreneur whose equipment, leases, FCC license,
trademarks, systems design and software had provided the
entire original endowment of the company -- wrote and
asked the debtor firm to "designate what, when and
where the inspection shall be allowed," the company,
by then renamed Fast Page, Inc., hastened to Jerry Carr
Whitehead, and sought and received an Ex Parte
Restraining Order to block any such inspection or
verification.
Such inspection, said Whitehead, would appear
to be "a tortious interference and obstruction of
plaintiff's right to carry on its business" and
would "do an irreparable injury to plaintiff."
Although bankruptcy matters are, under the
U.S. Constitution, under the jurisdiction of the federal
courts, Whitehead, a judge of the Second Judicial
District of the State of Nevada, on October 18, 1988,
turned the restraining order into a preliminary
injunction, the intent of which was, he said, to maintain
"the current 'status quo'" between Edwards and
Fast Page, and insure "there shall be no disruption
of plaintiff's [Fast Page's] business by virtue of the
exercise of any rights being granted to defendants
[Edwards and others] herein."
Top of page
|
Early next year at a January 1989
hearing, the court documents charge, Whitehead
"attempted to coerce an assignment of the rights
granted by the bankruptcy court," using threats of
"incarceration, monetary sanction, and financial and
professional ruin."
When Edwards refused, he says in count I of
the complaint he filed early this year against Whitehead,
the district judge told him he "would see to it that
this was the sorriest day of Plaintiff's life." and
subsequently "Whitehead sanctioned Plaintiff and
others several hundred thousand dollars and permanently
restrained Plaintiff and others from exercising those
rights granted by statute and federal court order and
judgment."
On August 7, 1989, state district judge
Whitehead issued a conclusion of law that his court had
jurisdiction over all relevant issues, made permanent his
earlier preliminary injunction, and modified the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court's position that the creditors could make
reasonable inspections of the equipment that formed the
collateral for the debt.
Instead, Whitehead ordered that Edwards and
the other creditors henceforth "are allowed to
conduct no inspections of plaintiff's books, records,
collateral or inventory."
According to the lawsuit complaint, Edwards
has filed criminal complaints against Whitehead with the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Las Vegas Federal
Grand Jury, the U.S. Attorney's office for the district
of Nevada, the federal U.S. Trustees Office and the
Office of the Nevada Attorney General.
Edwards' lawsuit is not only against
Whitehead, but also Second Judicial District Judge
Deborah A. Agosti, who, count II of the complaint says,
in 1993 also issued a Preliminary Injunction and
Restraining Order stopping Edwards "from exercising
those rights granted by statute and federal order and
judgment."
While Agosti recognized that both she and
Whitehead had lacked jurisdiction in the bankruptcy
matter, says Edwards in his complaints, she,
"incredibly, continued to issue orders" and
"has refused to respect the orders of the bankruptcy
court, and is attempting to grant relief to the bankrupt
debtor in the same fashion as Whitehead. Debtor Fast Page
is in arrears in payment in the approximate amount of
$270,000 as of January 1, 1996, and continues to enjoy
the use of the intellectual and real property of
Plaintiff which is the subject of the default
action."
§ § §
|